The first foreign take-over of a major Japanese firm shows how markets are changing

Taiwanese manufacturer Foxconn is  taking over the  Japanese electronics company Sharp, which has been making losses for over four years but is still a leader in liquid display technology,.

Before the announcement of a deal, Sharp had been discussing a rival offer from a government-backed consortium of Japanese investors, but that fell through.

We have tended to say that the Japanese electronics market is oligopolistic, because there are just a few major firms. But the trends in the past few years and the fiercely competitive nature of the market (including price competition) have changed it. Maybe it fits the monopolistically competitive market structure better now, particularly once the global market is factored in.

Another part of economic analysis to consider is whether or not the Foxconn-Sharp tie-up will yield economies of scale. On the face of it there does not seem to be much potential for exploiting economies of scale because the two firms’ activities have a limited overlap. But Foxconn assembles most of the world’s iPhones and the merger will give it a more crucial position in the supply chain of Apple, which uses Sharp screens on its devices,

Mergers with foreign firms may enable Japanese firms to become more productive and less cosseted from competition. It could be a way to revitalise Japan’s economy, which is necessary as the domestic population and consumption shrink.


2 responses to “The first foreign take-over of a major Japanese firm shows how markets are changing”

  1. Paul Elder says :

    After the purchase of Sharp by Foxconn, would Foxconn products be considered imports or domestic goods for Japanese consumers?

    • econyamada says :

      If they are manufactured/assembled in Taiwan, they will still be imports. The growth of MNCs and FDI have complicated the whole international trade picture and theories of comparative advantage. Basically, the designation of goods as imports and exports still depends on where the good is made and to where it is shipped rather than on the company’s “nationality”.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: